This may seem like a bit of a rant and perhaps it is to some degree.
I’m not a film critic. I’m actually a pretty easygoing and forgiving viewer. Now that doesn’t mean I like every movie I see. I have turned off movies I don’t like, even walked out of a theater a couple of times. That also doesn’t mean I can’t critique a film, I do, I’m just not someone who views a movie with critiquing in mind. At my age I know what I like, I know what type of stories I enjoy and these days I’m rarely disappointed.
I’m really not a film snob, I had a friend who would snub anything he considered too commercial, and I’m open to many types of films. Movies to me are a form of art but to me I also enjoy the mindless escapism the types of movies I enjoy. I don’t mind serious film, but following on my last entry on how I loved the more lighthearted fare of the Science-Fiction films from the 90s, the types of movies I like are those that have a fun aspect to them.
I also feel many professional critics can be a bit snobbish and harsh. From a psychological perspective many people think negatively and even cynically and bring that into their criticisms. I’ve read some reviews that were more cynicism than critique.
Since judging art is so subjective, bad reviews generally don’t put me off on a film. I enjoy reading criticism of films but I don’t let them sway me and will judge for myself whether or not I enjoy a film.
I like to read the reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I disagree where they put their fresh rating. I say if a movie has 51% rating that means a majority of critics liked a movie, albeit a small majority. So deeming a movie “Fresh” at 60% is a bit arbitrary.
What I’ve noticed is that within my DVD collection there are many movies from the Science-Fiction and Fantasy film genres that did not get fresh ratings on Rotten Tomatoes. It goes to show that I really don’t listen to critics much. Also, I find, on social media anyway, no matter what movie is announced, haters come pouring out of the woodwork as if Pavlov rang his bell and his dogs begun salivating. People seem negative in general and closed minded. Nasty people have come along and questioned my taste in movies but in the end I like what I like with no apologies and what others think of my tastes matters not.
Here, in no particular order, are movies from my collection that have received a not so fresh rating.
Seventh Son – 20%
The Great Wall – 35%
Gods of Egypt – 15%
Jupiter Ascending – 26%
GeoStorm – 14%
Independence Day Resurgence – 30%
Batman & Robin – 10%
Judge Dredd (199?) – 17%
The Scorpion King – 41%
Journey 2 the Mysterious Island – 45%
Godzilla (1998) – 16%
The Day After Tomorrow – 44%
Van Helsing – 23%
Planet of the Apes (2001) – 45%
The Time Machine (2002) – 29%
Alien Trespass – 34%
Land of the Loss – 26%
Race to Witch Mountain – 43%
Skyline – 16%
Cowboys and Aliens – 43%
Green Lantern – 26%
Battleship – 34%
After Earth – 11%
John Carter – 51% *
GI Joe: Rise of Cobra – 35%
GI Joe: Retaliation – 29%
Pixels – 17%
Man of Steel – 56% *
Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice – 26%
Justice League – 40%
Power Rangers – 45%
Velarian and the City of a Thousand Planets – 49%
Pacific Rim: Uprising – 46%
Clash of the Titans – 28%
Wrath of the Titans – 26%
Immortals – 36%
Prince of Persia: Sands of Time – 36%
Star Trek: The Motion Picture – 44%
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier – 22%
Star Trek: Generations – 49%
Star Trek: Insurrection – 55% *
Star Trek: Nemesis- 38%
* I included a few that do have an above 50% rating but those are still technically considered rotten.
# I also only included the 1998 American Godzilla movie even though there are many Japanese Godzilla movies that also have rotten railings. I will cover them someday on my new Godzilla Designs blog. https://godzilladesigns.wordpress.com/2018/07/03/the-eras-of-godzilla-films/
I thought I would review today a favorite movie of mine that mixes fantasy, historical time periods and time travel into one fun adventure.
I really enjoy these types of movies. At their heart movies such as Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time are supposed to be fun and adventure filled escapist entertainment. This is where the movie succeeds. First of all the movie is a visual palette of wondrous colors, scenery, architecture, costumes and characters that transports the viewer to another place and time. Secondly the story has all the right elements from heroism, bravery, treachery, betrayal, familial love and loyalty along with romance and laughter. Thirdly the story is epic in scope but intimate in its execution.
Based on a video game, which I have never seen, the story follows the adventure of Dastan a Prince of Persia, splendidly portrayed by Jake Gyllenhaal, who had been adopted by the king as a peasant living in poverty on the streets. Raised along with his adopted brothers Dastan leads his brothers and their armies to capture the city of Alamut where he meets the city’s beautiful princess Tamina, portrayed by the enchanting and stunning, Gemma Arterton, and he comes in possession of a mysterious dagger with time traveling abilities. That is the gist of the story and I will not go into great detail on the finer points of the story.
The movie is a fantasy and it is fun and enjoyable. If you enjoy fun, adventure filled fantasy epics the Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time is a great popcorn munching movie to escape into for a while. It will be time well spent.