In my effort to restart this blog I need to catch up on some movie reviews. Since Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was just released, how about I review the movie that came out before it! LOL!
As I have said before I am a huge Star Trek fan but I also love Star Wars too…just not as much as Trek. Yet, I always thought there was something in the aesthetic and pacing of Star Wars that Star Trek should borrow and learn from. When JJ Abrams, a lover of Star Wars, directed the 2009 reboot movie, Star Trek, my wish came true. In the feel and look of the movie there are elements of Star Wars in that Star Trek film and although some fans noticed that too and complained…I was not one of them. Therefore, when the next trilogy in Star Wars was going to be filmed, it seemed only natural that JJ Abrams would be selected to direct this movie.
I want to comment on one of the complaints The Force Awakened received from the minority of the people that did not like it. The complaint is that it is just a rehash or is derivative of the original 1977 film Star Wars, later retitled Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope. I certainly do not deny this accusation. I actually embrace it and it is one of the reasons I do enjoy this movie greatly.
Some have complained that nostalgia is one of its selling points and I have no shame in agreeing with that. I was 14 in 1977 when the original movie came out and I loved it! It had a huge impact on me. So seeing Han, Chewie, Luke and Leia on the big screen was a huge part of this movie. That doesn’t mean the rest of the story wasn’t good, it was, even if it has elements of the first movie, it does!
Luke has disappeared and it has been thirty years since the Death Star was once again blown up and the Empire defeated. However, evil has not gone away. We have new characters that are very interesting to me. the rebelling storm trooper, Finn, the scavenger, Rey, and Kylo Ren, the son of Han Solo and General Leia, are all great additions to the Star Wars universe. The movie leaves us with a mystery of who is this woman Ren who wields the Force so easily? The special effects are excellent as JJ Abrams wisely knows how to weave practical effects with the CGI.
I will not reveal any spoilers of this movie. I will say this is/was a great way to start the new trilogy. It is visually stunning with everything you would want to see in a Star Wars movie. Although it does have elements of the original story, they are done with respect and reverence to the original.
Today is the 50th anniversary of the beginning of Star Trek. The first episode, “The Man Trap” aired on this date, September 8, 1966. I was barely 3 years old at the time, wouldn’t actually turn 3 until that next month, so I never saw the original series in its original run.
It was 1975 and I was 12 years old. Our town just got cable and I discovered WPIX Channel 11 out of New York City. The station had reruns of the Munsters, the Brady Bunch and Gilligans Island and even Godzilla movies. Enough to make a burgeoning nerd happy. Then I discovered a show called Star Trek and my life was never the same!
I was hooked from the start. I do not remember the first episode I saw but soon I was watching the show any time it was on. I loved the characters and the stories. Life was not always easy at home so I was drawn to Spock. He was logical and seemed to have conquered these human emotions. My love of science-fiction was something that I was drawn to as a young child. I never felt that I chose science-fiction I always felt that it chose me.
Star Trek had/has dramatic stories of aliens and the problems of the human condition along with time travel and history all wrapped in a positive vision of the future with larger than life historic characters. Though I was young when I first began watching the show I learned later in life how groundbreaking the show was in showing human diversity and races and cultures getting along harmoniously. I think that is what I enjoyed most about Star Trek and still do. Beneath well acted and well written stories is the theme of hope for the future.
So Happy Birthday Star Trek! You have lived long and prospered and long may you continue to do so!
I was watching Star Trek Original Series movies (I-VI) and wanted to nit-pick the destruction of the Enterprise in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock. I love that movie and I didn’t mind the destruction of the Enterprise, I just thought the destruction was rather wimpy. However, I do like the scene with Kirk, McCoy, Scotty, Sulu and Checkov are watching the fireball wreckage of the Enterprise streak against the sky. That was a spectacular scene. I just wanted a larger explosion. An equally spectacular scene could have been the crew viewing the sky with a giant cloud of debris from outer space painted across the horizon from the explosion of the Enterprise.
Take Star Trek the Motion Picture for example. The V’Ger cloud and ship was enormous. The movie says the cloud measured a diameter in excess of two astronomical units, or more than 299.195 million kilometers! When Kirk orders the Self-Destruct a crewman asks Scotti if that will also destroy V’Ger. He says that when that much mater and anti-matter collide it will take out V’Ger also. I am paraphrasing.
Switch to the Self-Destruct of the Enterprise in Star Trek III. When the explosion happens it barley destroys the saucer section of the ship! So instead of a cataclysmic explosion that would take out a ship and its surrounding cloud that was more than 299.195 million kilometers in size, what we get is an explosion that barely singes the nose hairs of Klingon Commander Kruge in the nearby Bird-of-Prey!!
Thanks for reading my little nerd rant.
Star Trek Continues is a fan based web series of very high quality. Their most recent episode is entitled “The Fairest of them All” which is a continuation of the Original Series episode Mirror Mirror. When Kirk, McCoy, Uhura and Scotty beam back to their rightful Mirror Universe this Captain Kirk will have a Spock that might not be as dedicated to the Terran Empire as he once was. This is a brilliant idea for an episode and it is very well written and acted. Try it out!
Next week I will have my review of After Earth, starring the Father-Son team of Will and Jaden Smith. The week after that I will review and contrast the new RoboCop movie with the 1987 original. Also, my review of the movie Pompeii will be coming soon.
I re-watched this movie a couple of times recently. I still enjoy the movie very much, yet despite my enjoyment there was something gnawing at my stomach with this movie and I had a difficult time putting my finger on it. Then as I watched it again twice I finally figured out what is bothering me.
There are two important moments in the film and in my opinion this franchise had not yet earned the importance of them. Let me explain: I still have mixed feeling about them using Khan as the villain. It was done so well in the original series episode Space Seed and Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan with Ricardo Montalbán I really wanted them to leave it alone. It didn’t need to be redone in my opinion. This takes nothing away from Benedict Cumberbatch and his acting. He did a superb job in the role. It just didn’t feel like Khan to me.
Here is why. The movie was basically a remake of both the original series episode Space Seed and Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. In a sense Star Trek into Darkness emotionally piggy backed on the known threat that Khan was in those two shows. It even took a cameo by Leonard Nimoy as Spock Prime to drive that point home. The problem, as I see it, Star Trek Into Darkness did not earn the tension, the threat, that Khan was in this movie. To the crew of the Enterprise in Star Trek Into Darkness they had no clue who Khan was and in many ways, since Kirk or Spock really did not have much of a relationship with this Khan, he really wasn’t the big threat that the movie likes to pretend he was. We, the audience, felt the threat that Khan was in the movie because we had a multi-year relationship with the character!
Sure, Khan/Harrison did some bad things at the start of the movie but he could have been any villain. Heck, they could have made Cumberbatch the rouge Captain Garth of Izar from the original series episode Whom God’s Destroy. It would have worked just as well. Or he could have been a totally new villain with the same story and it would not have made much of a difference. So for me, this version of Khan lacked the history with the crew of the Enterprise to be such a big deal.
The same type of issue shows itself with the death of Kirk. In Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan the death of Spock was so powerful because both the crew and the audience had a long standing history with the character. In the rebooted Star Trek these relationships are not as well established. Just because we throw the name Kirk and Spock on these actors doesn’t mean we have the same emotional connection with these characters as we did/do with the original characters and actors and their portrayal of the characters.
In this universe/time-line Kirk and Spock are barely friends. At the start of Star Trek Into Darkness Spock betrays Kirk for violating the Prime Directive and it creates a problem for this growing friendship. Toward the end of this movie Kirk dies instead of Spock and Spock, in anguish over the loss of his friend, screams KHAAAAAN!! like Shatner did in the Wrath of Khan. However, the whole things feels hollow. This Kirk and Spock do not have the multi-year history as friends which made the death of one of them so moving. These two characters have not earned that intimacy yet! Sure, you could see this new Spocks reaction over Kirks death as a way to say that he regrets betraying Kirk at the start of the movie, it still lacks the emotional jolt the scene was going for because these two characters are not yet solid in their friendship.
Having said all of that I still do like the movie. It has a good story and good acting along with great special effects. Benedict Cumberbatch was spectacular. I just wished he wasn’t playing Khan.
In the next movie I do hope they do not rehash other characters from the original series. Well, at least not as the main villain. In truth I hope I hope they do give us someone and something new. I desire to see the new crew in exploration and wish that the enemy they face is some new anomaly or force of nature.
Less than a month from now Star Trek Into Darkness will come out in theaters here in the US. I must confess that I am on message boards where people in Australia have already seen the film so I know the majority of the spoilers. This blog post however, will NOT CONTAIN ANY SPOILERS!
I am also working my way through the original series on the remastered DVDs. I really love the 1960s original series. I also love Star Trek: The Next Generation and also Voyager. I could never get into Star Trek: Deep Space 9 beyond a handful of episodes that I enjoy and the same goes for the final series called Enterprise. I do like all of the movies even the so-called “bad ones” Like Star Trek V: The Final Frontier and Star Trek: Nemesis the last movie to feature the Next Generation crew.
I also love JJ Abram’s last Star Trek movie…it really is one of my favorites, if not my very favorite. Yet I sill have some struggles with it. My main struggle is where to place this movie in the time line along with my other favorite Star Trek shows? Yup, I am a big old nerd concerned about such things.
Here is the problem. They have two future characters, Spock and Nero, a renegade Romulan ready for revenge that travel back in time. Or do they? The writers of the movie Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman have stated that the Narada (Nero’s ship) by going back in time and destroying the USS Kelvin, an laternate time line gets established but it doesn’t erase the old timeline. While I am fine with that concept, the problem is that the movie really fails to communicate that concept. In many ways the movie plays like a typical Star Trek time travel episode where in the end everything is set right…except in this case there is no reset button at the end.
Uhura says something about an alternate reality but that is a vague statement. While the term alternate reality is a synonym for a parallel universe which is a hypothetical or fictional self-contained separate reality coexisting with one’s own, much of the movie plays out as if Spock and Nero are from the future of the reality of the central characters. The writers want you to think both things at the same time and that is what gets confusing. They treat Nero and Spock Prime as if they are from the future of Young Spock and Young Kirk when in reality they are not from their future if the alternate reality theory is true.
Take the destruction of Vulcan for example. If the alternate reality theory is true, Spock Prime (old Spock) really is not witnessing the destruction of his planet Vulcan, but the Vulcan from this parallel universe or alternate reality. In Spock Prime’s reality his home planet, the one we first saw in the original series episode, “Amok Time” still exists in the original reality.
Lets take the destruction of Romulus. Supposedly it took place in the regular Prime Universe or reality and that by going through the Black Hole Nero and Spock Prime end up in the alternate reality where Romulus still exists. When Nero is interrogating Captain Pike and Pike says that Romulus still exists and Nero screams that it has happened (the destruction of Romulus), why didn’t Pike tell him…or someone tell him…that they are in a new reality and that in this reality Romulus still exists?
Bu they don’t say anything because, as I said, the movie plays out as if it is all occurring in the prime universe that we all love…but this time without a reset button. The loss of Vulcan, Spock’s mother, Kirk’s father etc, has more of an emotional punch if all of the characters are from the prime universe.
My struggle with that is I don’t care for the idea that old Trek has been erased through the actions of this Trek reboot. So I will accept the writers intent even though I think the evidence is pretty flimsy. I do like the movie, honestly I do…depite the problem.
I also had a scenario where Trek 09 does take place in an already preexisting reality completely separate from the original Trek time line. In other words, Spock Prime and Nero really are from the future of young Spock and young Kirk as depicted in the movie and they are not from the original time line. The only problem with that is it is hard to see Leonard Nimoy as Spock Prime and not think of him as the same Spock we all have known and loved. For this scenario to work I would have to see Zac Quinto as the older version of Spock. I agree with the many fans who wished they had done a straight out-and-out reboot instead of the half-reboot that we got.
Ah, the wonders of the internet! Prior to the internet I enjoyed certain movies in relative peace not knowing that I wasn’t supposed to like them. Until I got on the internet I never knew that some movies were so hated by the fandom of certain franchises. For example in 1989 I went to the theater to see the new Star Trek movie, Star Trek V: The Final Frontier. The theater was full and people were laughing (the movie had raised the level of comedy since Star Trek IV), I enjoyed the story and had a very good time. It wasn’t until somewhere in the early 2000s did I learn how hated that movie is among the rest of the fans of the franchise. I never knew until then that I was not supposed to like it. I never got the memo.
All who follow my blog know that I am a huge fan of the Godzilla franchise. Well, last June I joined a message board devoted to the franchise and that hatred for the 1998 American Godzilla movie and the 2004 Godzilla: Final Wars by the majority of the fans on this site is palpable! Again, I never got the memo I was not supposed to like these films!
Then there are other places on the net which feature trailers for upcoming movies and message boards to discuss upcoming movies. On these sites you have members crying foul and saying this movie will suck even before they see the film. It fits the very definition of prejudice. On one of these sites there was a member, who hates the movies of Christopher Nolan, who is 100% convinced that the new Superman movie, Man of Steel, will suck and be the worse Superman movie ever made. This person said they will wait to borrow the movie from the library just to confirm how awful it really is. Talk about confirmation bias!
Then there is Ain’t It Cool News…This web site run by Harry Knowles is a great place to learn about up coming movies and reviews for the movies as they come out and a lot of other behind the scenes information. Just don’t read the talk back section. No wonder it was successfully parodied in Kevin Smith’s movie “Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back.” It is filled with trolls just trash talking everyone and everything.
Maybe it is my age. I am not sure of the demographics of the people on these sites but I suspect they’re young. It can be a challenge for someone who enjoys science fiction movies, and who enjoys following the making of these movies before they come out, to find intelligent and meaningful discussion in these places. I will continue to look for news and find these rare discussions that make this hobby enjoyable. I just need to ignore the trolls.
In my review of Star Trek: The Motion Picture I will be reviewing the director’s cut. The first of along line of Star Trek films came out in 1979, ten years after the cancellation of the original series. I won’t go into the history of the making of this movie,or how it came into being, that really isn’t the focus of this post.
This movie has been dubbed Star Trek: The Motionless Picture. Robert Wise was the director who had numerous great films under his belt. He won an Academy award for Best Director for the 1961 movie, West Side Story. He also directed science-fiction classics The Day the Earth Stood Still and the Andromeda Strain. Although the movie did make $139 million on a $46 million budget it was basically panned by critics and fans alike for being dull, boring and plodding despite state of the art special effects. I will give a short synopsis of the movie and then review both the pros and cons.
Synopsis: A large cloud has invaded the galaxy destroying Klingon war ships and space stations. On Vulcan Spock is under going the Kolinahr discipline to purge himself from his remaining emotions. When he sense an intelligence somewhere in the galaxy he stops the process. Meanwhile a newly designed USS Enterprise under the command of Captain Will Decker is in space dock. Admiral Kirk convinces Starfleet to take command of the Enterprise to intercept the cloud.
Enroute to the cloud Spock meets up with the Enterprise and joins as science officer. Ilia, the Deltan navigator of the Enterprise is abducted when the crew first encounters the alien cloud. She is sent back to the ship as a robotic artificial life form to learn about the crew. As tensions mount between Admiral Kirk and Commander Decker (temporarily demoted to that rank) the crew encounters what is at the center of the cloud. It calls itself V’Ger but it turns out to be an old earth probe, Voyager VI, that had been repaired by a machine planet and returned to earth to complete its mission. In order to evolve and learn more V’Ger unites with Ilia and Commander Decker.
I will first state the CONs:This movie can be slow and prodding at times. Todays movies are paced faster but even in 1979 it was a slow movie. Production was delayed and the release date was not changed so at the time of release the theatrical version could not be changed much to Robert Wise’s chagrin. The color scheme, looking to pay homage to 2001: A Space Oddesy, was bland and uninspiring.
PROs: I must admit, even in 1979 the nostalgia factor influenced me. It was 10 years after the series had been canceled (back then when I was in my mid teens that was an eternity. I love the almost 5 minutes of seeing the new updated Enterprise. The old series used to show the Enterprise from very limited perspectives so the showing off of the new ship was, and still is, a wonderful sight to behold. I also enjoyed how all the crew are reunited. The redesigned bridge is wonderful too. When Spock returns to the Enterprise and walk on the bridge unexpectedly it is like the king has returned. A very dramatic moment and my favorite scene in the movie.
I enjoy the story too. Some fans complain about the story being nothing more than a retread of the series episode The Changeling where Kirk and the Enterprise encounter a machine that is returning to earth join with its creator. While I do admit there are similar elements it doesn’t bother me. Finding out that at the heart of the cloud was V’Ger an old Voyager VI was an unexpected and creative twist that I enjoyed in 1979 and still enjoy in 2013.
I may be in the minority enjoying this movie, but I am used to that. There are other franchises where I may like a movie that others do not. I think my enjoyment of the series is due to nostalgia. The movie does play into that. If you did not grow up in the 60s and 70s watching the series on cable waiting for the movie to be made then you might not understand the nostalgia. Many fans that grew up on Star Trek: The Next Generation or Star Trek: Deep Space 9 do not often understand the nostalgic attachment to the first movie.
Oh the irony!! Just after doing a post on excessive violence I watched one of the most violent movies I have seen in a while. It is even more violent than the recently reviewed Looper. Like Total Recall this is a remake of a movie produced in the 1990s. The original movie, called Judge Dredd, starred Sylvester Stallone as the dreaded Judge with Rob Schnieder providing comic relief. The 1995 film did pretty well at the box office despite poor reviews from the critics. The remake did much better with the critics but was a gigantic bomb at the box office bringing in only $13 million domestically and $19 million in the foreign market for a total of $32 million worldwide. This was far short of recapping the $50 million budget which is a small budget for this type of film.
Judge Dredd is based on a comic book character. The premise of both the films and the comic book is a dystopian future where the policefore and judiciary system is combined. The judges dispense justice on the spot. I guess lawyers are not needed in the future. Another aspect of the character is that Dredd is never seen with his judges helmet off. The helmet covers almost everything except the mouth and lower jaw. The eyes are covered and are not seen. Stallone takes his helmet off many times and is seen throughout most of the movie with the helmet off. This was one of the major complaints from the fans of the comic book against the 1995 film.
Here is my review. I almost shut the movie off! This is very violent and down right depressing! The majority of the movie takes place on one day in a dilapidated highrise building in Mega-City One. Dredd, who is training a female for a Judge’s position, when a drug bust goes bad and the criminals lock down the building and try to hunt down Dredd and his partner.
There is not much of a plot but there is tons of graphic violence shown in slow motion. The drug that these people are on gives a sense of slowing down time so we the viewers are treated to graphic carnage and bloodshed in order to experience the violence those that are on this drug are experiencing. No thanks, I’ll pass.
Karl Urban (Star Trek, Lord of the Rings Trilogy) plays the iconic judge. I think he did well overall. The problem isn’t completely in his performance, some of the problems are in the script. Judge Dredd is supposed to be a legendary judge with a brutal and feared reputation. The original 1995 film made this clear with the performance of the larger-than-life Sylvester Stallone. I don’t think Urban as an actor can pull off that the larger-than-life persona that Sylvester Stallone can. I also don’t think the script showed the Dredd character as larger than life or a judge that all feared. He seemed like just one of the many judges out on the streets of Mega-City One.
Plus, other than Arnold and Bruce Willis no one can deliver over-the-top one liners like Stallone. That was part of the fun and joy of the original. While both versions were rated R the original was fun to watch, Stallone was a larger than life Judge Dredd who gets set up by his twin brother, played by Armand Assante, and is exiled and must find his way back into Mega-City One to redeem himself. While that movie was serious it also had fun moments and never took itself too seriously.
As I said in a previous post the Batman movies has led to many comic book movies to take a turn toward gritty realism. While in the Batman franchise that is done with success, with Dredd the gritty realism fails miserably. There is no joy in Mudville.
One positive, or semi-positive aspect of the movie is Olivia Thirlby as Judge Cassandra Anderson. her psychic abilities make her a good candidate but she is on the shy and insecure side. Watching her test her skills in the make it or break it day on the job is a highlight in this picture. Without her there really isn’t a story at all. My one complaint, and it isn’t too big, is that she goes from shy-wallflower to cold-hearted judge to quickly.
I really cannot recommend this movie. I suggest you watch the 1995 original if you’re in a Judge Dredd type of mood. I only recommend this movie to those who have stomachs. One final good point is the movie is 95 minutes long and it went by real fast!
Far be it for me to turn this fun blog into something political. I really do not want to do that. Although I cannot turn on the news, read a newspaper or browse Facebook without running into the gun control debate that is not a debate I want to bring up here. One point in the debate does have relevance here, and that is the charge that Hollywood movies are part of the blame in creating a generation of people prone to violence. I think cause and effect are complex subjects and I think the question itself is an overgeneralization and demonstrates black and white thinking. So I want to bring it closer to home and discuss my feelings about violent movies. The Newtown shootings did have me evaluating my enjoyment of violent movies and I have found myself a little less comfortable with certain types of violence.
I have enjoyed movies such as Goodfellas, The Godfather, the lethal Weapon franchise, the Die Hard franchise. Heck, I am a huge Godzilla fan which has the destruction of major cities in every movie. So I had to ask myself why is watching violence so enjoyable? Are we desensitized to violence? I don’t think so. I think the bottom line is that we know that the violence in movies is not real. I think there is a part of our psyche that does know the difference between violence and reality. I think that is the way it is for most people.
We are an aggressive species. We do have violent tendencies and anger is a problem for a lot of people and it can take a life time for some to learn how to manage that volatile emotion. Many episodes from the original Star Trek series addressed mans violence and the show wanted depict human society as having become less violent. It is something I hope that does happen although I am not holding my breath. On the other hand, as I have read my history, I think we are less violent to some degree.
I find that as I have gotten older I am enjoying movies that are not to dark and depressing. I watch movies to be entertained and therefore these movies need to have some humor and light moments to them and not take themselves to seriously. So I find myself moving away from films that are too dark and violent. I have no desire to see Djano Unchained because of that. I recently watched the new Total Recall movie. The original was rated R and very violent while the new movie was rated PG-13 and toned down the violence. I liked that aspect of it.
So I probably will always enjoy car chases, phaser battles, sword fights, explosions, monster’s fighting and the occasional gun battle. I just want those movies to not celebrate violence. I still want these movies to be fun and enjoyable.
Thanks for reading my little rant, and I will be back on Friday with a return to the final movies in my Godzilla series.